It occurred with José Mourinho, with Luiz Felipe Scolari, with André Villas-Boas, with Carlo Ancelotti and with Mourinho once more, simply a few years in the past, when the membership described the ambiance on the coaching floor as one in every of “palpable discord.” So now it should be claiming Conte, too, only a few months after he won the Premier League.
It’s a convincing analysis, and but it isn’t one that’s borne out by the signs. Conte stays animated and agitated throughout video games. His gamers — maybe other than Eden Hazard — nonetheless fulfill his needs. In opposition to Metropolis, their lack of inspiration was not proof of their lack of belief in Conte, however of the alternative, if something.
“They adopted my directions,” Conte mentioned. “We ready the sport on this means: to not concede house between the traces, as a result of whenever you play towards Metropolis, it’s a must to use the pinnacle, otherwise you danger ending the sport in a foul means, conceding three or 4.”
No, Conte’s relationship along with his crew shouldn’t be a explanation for Chelsea’s present malaise — it has misplaced 4 of its final 5 Premier League video games, has gained solely twice because the flip of the 12 months, and is now fifth within the league standings, 5 factors adrift of Tottenham for the fourth and last Champions League spot — however a symptom of one thing broader and extra complicated, one thing that doesn’t include an easy resolution.
Partly, it’s of Chelsea’s personal making. It isn’t simply the proprietor Roman Abramovich’s largess that has turned this membership into a contemporary superpower, however the tradition he has fostered, too.
The 21st-century Chelsea has by no means tolerated failure. Nearly uniquely in England, it doesn’t indulge philosophies, not less than people who lengthen any additional than merely profitable. It doesn’t provide endurance, or — with one Portuguese exception — second possibilities. It has embraced short-termism, and thrived due to it.
All of that has introduced 4 Premier League titles, a slew of F.A. Cups and, in fact, the Champions League trophy that Abramovich all the time craved.
It does, although, come at a price. It is a membership the place the gamers are inured to the concept that bust should all the time comply with growth, and that, when it does, they won’t be those held accountable.
There may be an impact on managers, too, an consciousness that no matter occurs, they won’t essentially be those who should cope with the fallout. Mourinho has all the time been a vibrant, however transient, burner, and Conte is in the identical mildew.
He can ask Hazard to play ready he doesn’t like, or write off ahead Alvaro Morata, as a result of their long-term happiness shouldn’t be his concern. He can stoke rigidity with Abramovich’s adjutants as a result of he doesn’t have to consider their long-term relationship.
Introducing a brand new supervisor is not going to change that dynamic. It is going to merely permit it to lie dormant for an additional few months, one other couple of seasons. A title may even comply with, whereas it does. However it would return, in the end.
However all of this has been exacerbated by one thing Chelsea can not management, one thing it must reply to if it needs to maintain tempo not simply with Manchester Metropolis, however Manchester United, too.
Chelsea has lengthy been a creature of the Premier League period; it has helped to outline the zeitgeist, and in return has been outlined by it. Within the 1990s, earlier than Abramovich, Chelsea was within the vanguard as English soccer opened its doorways and hearts to international gamers like by no means earlier than. Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli, Gianfranco Zola and the remainder helped to usher in a brand new period, with Stamford Bridge as their launchpad.
Within the 2000s, it was the arrival of Abramovich that remodeled the panorama as soon as once more, kickstarting an inflationary spiral within the switch market, laying down the blueprint for dozens of worldwide house owners hoping to make use of soccer for private glory or political capital.
Now, although, it feels as if the world has moved on just a little, and Chelsea is lagging behind. Abramovich is not the richest man within the room: He has to compete with Manchester Metropolis and Paris Saint-Germain within the switch market, groups backed by complete nations. He’s not decisive in the way in which he was a decade in the past.
As an alternative, Chelsea has — admirably — got down to turn into self-sustaining. With solely a slight air of a crew decided to drag up the drawbridge as quickly because the hold is full, it has turn into a eager advocate of Monetary Honest Play.
The impact has been pronounced. Morata price $80 million when he joined from Actual Madrid final summer season. It’s a important outlay, however one which Metropolis, United, Liverpool and even Arsenal would now regard as possible. All 4 can provide wages akin to these accessible at Stamford Bridge, too. Too typically within the switch market, Chelsea appears decided to purchase in bulk, fairly than shell out the premium figures now required for premium expertise.
Likewise, the absence of an overarching philosophy is beginning to seem like a aggressive drawback. It’s no coincidence that Chelsea has misplaced floor, in two of the final three seasons, to groups with a discernible identification, fairly than to people who are merely a patchwork of excellent gamers assembled by a number of totally different managers.
That isn’t to say that Chelsea is completed. It would beat Barcelona, and go on to win the Champions League. It would but end fourth, and even third, within the Premier League. It would appoint Luis Enrique or Max Allegri and win the title subsequent 12 months. However quickly sufficient, with out some type of change, it is going to be right here once more, booming and busting, time and again.