Canada’s Supreme Court Backs Indigenous Rights in Dispute Over Yukon Wilderness

Canada’s Supreme Court Backs Indigenous Rights in Dispute Over Yukon Wilderness


The Blackstone River running through Yukon’s Peel Watershed. The Supreme Court said a preservation plan could not be rewritten by the territorial government.

Aaron Vincent Elkaim for The New York Times

In a victory for indigenous groups, Canada’s Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Yukon territorial government could not rewrite a plan to protect a vast stretch of wilderness because a joint indigenous-government commission had already agreed to it.

In trying to revise the plan, the court said in a unanimous ruling, the territorial government violated 30-year-old treaties between the government and indigenous groups, which gave those groups a role in deciding how their traditional lands should be managed.

The decision marks the end of a long legal fight between indigenous First Nations and the Yukon government over the fate of 26,000 miles of the Peel Watershed, a pristine region of mountains and rivers that also has huge deposits of coal, gas and minerals.

The decision will have broad ramifications for Canada’s indigenous reconciliation efforts, said Gordon Christie, a professor of aboriginal law at the University of British Columbia.

“This case sends a signal that governments need to abide by modern treaties they’ve signed,” he said.

The joint commission, which was made up of appointees from the First Nations and the Yukon government, spent seven years negotiating with both sides before presenting a final recommendation in 2011 to set aside 80 percent of the wilderness for conservation, with the rest allotted for road construction and resource extraction. But in 2014, the Yukon government rejected the commission’s plan and adopted its own version, which would have opened more than two-thirds of the area to industrial development.

Source link

About The Author

Related posts

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: